Reality Check. Home Cooking in Mexico and Burundi

I’ve had some wonderful comments on my earlier post, Your Friend the Kitchen, Really? And I’ve been mulling over some books I’ve been reading about food security, global food supplies, etc. One thing that always really bugs me about these books, many of which are quite excellent and which I’ll be commenting on shortly, is that they always assume that once enough crops are grown, then the job is done.

Well, it’s not, not until women don’t have to spend all day processing those crops. Mexico was pretty lucky. In the 1940s and 50s, crop productivity went way up, largely thanks to Norm Borlaug and his team funded by the Rockefeller Foundation with Mexican co-operation. (Not everyone agrees with that statement today but I’ll be happy to defend it).

At the same time, and for different reasons, the simple grindstone (metate) was replaced by the mechanized tortilla mill. Lots to say about this transition but that’s for another time. The key thing is that women were freed up from grinding about an hour a day for every adult to be fed (that is about five hours a day for a family).

The tortillas weren’t as good. The life was infinitely improved. I had a friend who worked for DIF (Desarollo Integral de la Familia, the main government agency dealing with family development) in the late 80s, early 90s. She told me that when they went into a village the first and most effective thing they could do to reduce child abuse was to put in a tortilla mill.

It was a casual statement but I’ve checked back with her and I am not misremembering. I just think of that mother. No grinding, no food for the family. Along comes her child. She just has to shove that child out of the way so she can feed her later.

And then along comes this from Diana Buja about home cooking in Burundi. It speaks for itself.

“A reality check on ‘real’ home cooking / sloooow food: On my most recent trip upcountry; we were working with women in a pretty remote area to help them organize basket-making, in which Burundian women excel. Problems in basket-making and sales include inputs and market access – problems also found in food production. In the colline [‘hill’] where we were working, an extended family was preparing for a wedding ceremony and of course food preparation was central. Everything, except the tomato paste, salt and palm oil, is grown – harvested – processed – cooked by the family:

– Rice [dryland], which had been harvested and dried in the sun, was being de-hulled by being pounded by two girls in large wooden pestle / mortars [there’s no near-by rice-processing available]. It will then be sifted and the chaff saved for feeding to livestock.

– Manioc had been soaked / dried in the sun / pounded into flour, which was being made into thick pate to eat with the sauces and meat.

– Manioc leaves were being chopped and then pounded in a mortar to make sombe, to which garden eggs [indigenous eggplants] and wild amaranthus and onions and red peppers would be added, making a tasty vegetable.

– A family goat had been slaughtered; meat was being chopped into chunks, for making into a thick stew laced with onions, tomatoes [from the homestead] and wild greens. Innards all were being prepared for use of one kind or another and the hide was being scraped by some boys, to be stretched and dried for sale in the local market. The feet and lower legs would be used by very poor to make meat broth.

– Plantains were being peeled and then fried in palm oil and then salted. Plantain peels go to the goats.

– Banana juice had been made from sweet bananas, and we were offered cups to sip on, while we talked about baskets. Banana peels go to the goats.

– Sorghum beer had alread been made by women in the family, from their own sorghum [of course!] and was read for serving.

Back to baskets: All grasses are locally collected and only the coloring is purchased. But market access is lacking. Same with crops and livestock – market access both for goods and services [milling; etc] are just too far away for people who must carry everything on their heads; the closest rural market being about a 2 hour walk one way. And the head woman in the family is crippled and so must rely on other family members for crop and meal preparation. But, being crippled, she’s become an excellent basket-weaver by way of gaining income for the family…

Oh, and water for the homestead is about an hour round-trip.

Bucolic notions of returning to simpler times? Ask these folks: they would LOVE to have their food-preparation even minimally improved!”

OK, you may say we have overshot the mark in the modern Western kitchen, not doing enough cooking.  Perhaps.  But let’s tread very carefully when we wax nostalgic.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

5 thoughts on “Reality Check. Home Cooking in Mexico and Burundi

  1. Judith Klinger

    I’m wondering if the balancing anecdote to the Burundi wedding feast preparations is this:
    I’m hired to bring a dinner to a family of four: father, daughter and 2 teen age girls. They are all well traveled and well off, live in Hong Kong, the father is British, the mother Singaporean. Chic, cosmopolitan people and about as far from Burundi as you can get.
    I ask if I should make fish, and the answer is well, no, not if it still looks like a fish. Meat? “Yes, meat is good, but please be sure it no longer looks the animal it came from. The girls won’t eat anything if they recognize it.”

    I’m in no position to cast judgment on anyone, and that is not my intent, but is this total disconnect from the food source a good thing? Or is it over shooting the mark, in the other direction?

    Nostalgia is lovely, rose colored; and I’m not so misty eyed that I advocate growing my own wheat and grinding it. But, should we also be looking at what’s been lost, or what trade offs have been made?

  2. Rachel Laudan

    Let the girls go hungry a bit, that’s what I say. No seriously, you have a point Judith. And I’m not sure what I would recommend. I don’t think planting gardens in schools is going to make a dent–wrong seasons, no serious consequences, just feel-good play.

    And there is a soppiness about nature now. I once remarked to a child who was reading a story about cute foxes and horrid humans out to get them that actually foxes killed chickens. Not a good idea, particularly since it wasn’t my child.

  3. Ji-Young Park

    Hi Judith,

    I see what you’re saying and I know people like this from various backgrounds. But food issues can be very complicated or rather people can have convoluted reasons for having them.

    The family lives in Hong Kong and the mother is from Singapore. Not so wild guess, I’m sure they’ve seen the nitty gritty, down and dirty aspects of food production. These things are much out in the open in many Asian countries than they are in the States or even France (have not been to Italy). At the very least they’ve probably seen a wet market in Hong Kong.

    I doubt that they’re lives are as far from the source in Hong Kong as the average Los Angeleno.

    They could be trying to differentiate themselves from the locals in Hong Kong (British father, they want to be different because, well, they are). They could be trying to prove how “modern and cosmopolitan” they are compared to the locals. They could be trying to prove that they are on the cutting edge of industrialization.

    Who knows…

  4. Judith Klinger

    Ciao Ji-Young!
    I honestly don’t know that they’ve seen the nitty gritty of food production. The older girl was horrified here in Italy when she saw a rabbit head in the butcher’s case window. Maybe it wasn’t a rabbit, but it was some animal that was still identifiable. I truly don’t think they were trying to ‘prove’ anything, they just are who they are and they are that insulated from the food chain. I know, I’m incredulous as well.

    I’ve been rolling around in my brain, the disconnect between animal and meat and it puzzles me.

    Oh, and Rachel, anytime you want your blog back…let us know! LOL!!

  5. Rachel Laudan

    Judith, I’m just delighted if you and Ji-Young want to go around on this. Actually I’ve just been commenting on a related discussion on the ASFS list that I am sure you both know about whether agrotourism will help create connections to the food chain. Depends on the kind of agrotourism but much seems of the petting zoo variety. I’ve no objection to that as long as it is seen as fun and not as serving a greater function.

I'd love to know your thoughts