Price, Politics, and the Thanksgiving Meal
The Political Background to the Thanksgiving Meal
When Lincoln declared Thanksgiving a national holiday in 1863, he, and the promoters of the holiday, were arguing for an inclusive meal that everyone could afford, and that could bring the country together. It took a while as the South as a whole did not participate until after Reconstruction. When I first arrived in the United States, however, I was astonished at the power of the holiday, at the efforts that Americans would make to return home or to include those who had nowhere to go.
It’s easy to forget what a radical, though not unprecedented idea, such a political meal was.In an effort to understand this, three years ago, I published an article entitled Thanksgiving, Or How to Eat American Politics in the Boston Globe. The meal was designed as a deliberate repudiation of the formal meals of aristocracies, of state dinners, of fine restaurants. All these were described as French, high French cuisine. They excluded whole swathes of society: most women; all children; and everyone not wealthy enough to have the dress, the education, and the money that gave access to these traditional political gatherings.
By contrast, the Thanksgiving meal, with its plebeian vegetables, its sturdy pies, its rib-sticking dressing, and as the years wore on, increasingly inexpensive turkey was an ample meal made accessible by its relative ease of preparation and its affordable price.
The Price of the Thanksgiving Meal According to the American Farm Bureau
And so it remains. I had been completely blind to the fact that every year since 1986 the American Farm Bureau has been estimating the cost of a Thanksgiving meal. This year, thanks to a tweet by Gulf Coast Food, an interesting research group at the University of Houston, I finally twigged.
Here are the relevant sentences from the American Farm Bureau’s announcement.
“WASHINGTON, D.C., November 17, 2016 – The American Farm Bureau Federation’s 31st annual informal price survey of classic items found on the Thanksgiving Day dinner table indicates the average cost of this year’s feast for 10 is $49.87. . . The AFBF survey shopping list includes turkey, bread stuffing, sweet potatoes, rolls with butter, peas, cranberries, a veggie tray, pumpkin pie with whipped cream, and coffee and milk, all in quantities sufficient to serve a family of 10 with plenty for leftovers.”
The American Farm Bureau Understates the Price
Now the figure of around $5.00 a diner is rather an underestimate. It only counts the cost of the ingredients, not some of the other costs. Let’s just stick to costs at the consumption end.
- The cost of energy to store the ingredients in the refrigerator and to cook the meal. The refrigerator in particular is an energy hog. Cooking, by contrast, is so inexpensive in America that no one hesitates to turn on the oven to roast a few vegetables. Off the historical scale.
- The cost of the cooking utensils. Even if you use a foil pan for the turkey and the least expensive supermarket saucepans, without an investment in utensils, no meal gets cooked.
- The cost of the serving dishes and utensils. Again, it may be paper plates, even plastic knives and forks. No one, though, just digs in to a communal bowl.
- The cost of the additional ingredients: cooking oil, salt, sugar for the pie and the cranberries and the coffee, and so on. And perhaps, just perhaps, that bloody mary before the meal. Or the wine with it.
- The labor of the (usually) woman who shops, stores, cooks, serves, and cleans up. (30-35% in restaurants)
- The cost of the space–kitchen, area to eat. Not everyone has this, and space and kitchens have a cost.
Even So, Has There Ever Been a More Affordable Feast Than Thanksgiving?
Even so, if you count in all those extras, you are probably talking about being able to put the meal on the table for about $100 (though obviously you can spend much, much more if you have the means). That is, about $10 a person for participating in the national feast day. Or, if working for the minimum wage, an hour and a half will buy you into the feast, three hours will buy you and your child or elderly parent in to the feast.
For an indication of just how inexpensive American food is today, in 1950, a working class French person had to work for 38 minutes to buy a loaf of bread, an hour to buy a stick of butter, and an hour to buy a quarter pound of meat.*
Jump forward to 2002, and a working class American had to work 13 minutes for a loaf of bread while a working class Argentinian had to work an hour, over four times as long.*
Often American food is called “cheap,” inviting the listener to supply the “and nasty” to complete the phrase. And so some of it is.
Not all “cheap” food is nasty, though. I like to use other, less pejorative words such as “inexpensive” or “affordable.” Cranberries, sweet potatoes, and turkey are not nasty. They are affordable. They are tasty. And they allow an entire nation to participate in the national feast.
Happy Thanksgiving!
*See the distinguished food and social historian, Peter Scholliers, in the American Historical Association’s recent introduction to food history, Paul Freedman et al, eds. Food in Time and Place p.346.
- The Most Famous Cooks You’ve Never Heard Of
- The Celebrity Cooks of the First Years of Television
This is a beautiful analysis. I love the approach. This holiday speaks of home and hearth. It touches deep emotions in all of us, even when the emotions are a bit on the dysfunctional side. Family, faux family, blended family, reconstructed family, absent family, broken family. The works. Le cha’im.
Another very interesting piece, many thanks. But I wonder if the food is affordable or if most of the costs (environmental and social not least) just go uncounted?
Well, that’s why I limited my comments on the under-estimate of the price to the consumption end. I tend to the view that even if environmental and social costs could be calculated, the food would still be affordable. That’s another huge set of issues, though, and particularly in a blog, it’s one issue at a time.
Wonderful piece on modern day Thanksgiving celebrations. Anyone who would like to take a look at an early 20th c. view, should read O. Henry’s TWO THANSKSGIVING DAY GENTLEMEN, amusing, tongue-in-cheek as only O Henry could write, but gives anothe angle of the “real meaning” of American Thanksgiving. I have a version which I abridged and am willing to send anyone if you contact me at lmakrisambrosia@gmail.com HAPPY THANKSGIVING AMERICA!
Thanks so much for this, Linda. A gem to add to my collection.
Rachel,
I enjoyed reading your recent blog post and in particular, the Boston Globe article.
The O. Henry reference from one of your readers was a bonus.
I just came across this article that cites a possibly credible and new primary literature reference for Thanksgiving that I thought might be of use to you:
http://gardenandgun.com/blog/real-story-americas-first-thanksgiving?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=socialmedia&utm_campaign=nov2016_facebook
Happy Thanksgiving!
Thanks for the reference, which I had missed. I believe the author of that article has a whole book forthcoming on Thanksgiving, which I look forward to seeing. I am not so much interesting the the “first” Thanksgiving as in how and why it got institutionalized as a national holiday. And that is where this republican (small r) tradition versus the aristocratic one (understood as best examplified by high French) comes in.
To me as well, the communal aspect of Thanksgiving put in historical and political context, is what appealed to me the most about your post. The VA Thanksgiving reference I thought might be of more general historical interest.
Back to your Thanksgiving post, it makes me wonder how many other similar days exist across the world in other cultures: I can think of harvest festivals, Pongal for instance, the harvest festival in south India (called by other names in others parts of India) comes to mind but there is some religious association.
Another element in this story: the huge number of organizations and individuals that raise funds and obtain donations to provide Thanksgiving dinner or its ingredients to those that are unable to afford the price you summarize or who in fact lack the home resources of kitchen, dininig space, etc. This effort is another part of the collective commitment to the inclusiveness of the holiday.
best… mae at maefood.blogspot.com
Absolutely. Thanks for making the point. Because as you say, it’s not just affording the ingredients, it’s having the fairly expensive set up of oven, stove top, pans, refrigerator, dishes, tables, space.
The Atlantic presents an alternative view:
https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/11/thanksgiving-a-celebration-of-inequality/508346/
Mae, I hadn’t seen this. It’s a great article, really well researched, don’t you think? And I don’t find it inconsistent with my line. But will definitely include it next year.